Gopinath Mohanty: The Asian ‘Achebe’
The entire nineteenth-century, especially the second half of it, was a period of cultural and religious ferment in India under the influence of western culture and missions. Believing that the civilization of India is barbaric and superstitious, the Colonisers think Western epistemological structure – culture, political ideology and philosophy, forms of government, educational and social infrastructure – are needed to be implied to civilize their colonies which according to them were inhabited by humanist subclasses. But the Missionaries had different missions. They bring along with them a new world of Christendom who intervene into the interests – livelihood, work, cultural practices, life style, food habit, social behaviour, social infrastructure – of the bulk of the rural population – landless labour, small and marginal farmers, artisans, nomads and various aboriginal without caring to understand the social peculiarities of the place; ignoring the religio-cultural sensitivity of people. Their moral superiority and doctrine of monopoly miserably fails to understand the social solidarity, social cohesion and social integration of the wretched of earth. Moreover, with their aggressive imperialism, the Christian missionaries are perpetrating in nature who can not recognise the dalit, marginalized, downtrodden and subaltern. And the indigenous people who is not a part or choose not to be a part of the course of Christianisation, fall victims to the seductive ideology of the missionaries. It is because their foundational principles and doctrines are alien, unreasonable and uncalled for and have been called into questions. They have been challenging and harmful to their sustainable living. In brief, the worst sufferers are the primitive people who live in isolation and are forgotten. Their liberty and equality and rights and justice are at stake. Those facilities are denied and gasping for breath. Needles to say, there has been a radical change in their ideas, value systems, beliefs, cultural practices and so on and so forth. And its abuses have been examined by writers from varied backgrounds. One of the first authors to address such issues in literary works is Gopinath Mohanty.
2. Mohanty, Gopinath, Paraja. (English translation by B. K. Das from original Oriya novel Paraja, 1945). Oxford University Press, Delhi, 1987.
3. Patnaik, Jitendra Narayan. “Oriya Novels in the 1930s and 1940s”. Orissa Review. (Sep-Oct 2008). Web. 31 Dec. 2011.
4. *ST & SC Department, Govt. of Odisha.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Copyrights lie with the authors/contributors.
- Authors can use their contribution later as they like. We simply expect they should give us credit as first published with CLRI with issue number/date.
- We aim to promote knowledge and to propagate knowledge, we permit readers and authors to use, quote, and refer from any articles published with CLRI freely. Authors must agree to this nature of copyright before they submit to us. However any readers or authors must give due credit to the authors and this journal properly with issue number and dates.
- The responsibility of the concept expressed in the writings published with any of our literary journals lies with the authors and Creative Content Media or Contemporary Literary Review India does not support or oppose any ideas of the authors or artists.
- In principle, we bring out our annual print edition with a different ISSN and we intend to include some of the writings published with our online issues during the past year.
Hence the contributors give us the right to include their pieces for this purpose.
- We don't accept any articles that reflect pornography, hatred or any sorts of aversion.
- We don’t pay to the authors presently.